Sporati on NBA’s video summary and description
The Celtics outscored the Pacers in the 4th quarter, 31-12, including a 16-0 run from 10:54 to 5:04 in the quarter to earn a 99-91 victory in Game 2 of this …
Video information
This NBA’s video is titled PACERS vs CELTICS | Kyrie Irving Takes Over | Game 2 and credited to NBA. Viewing time is 00:09:28, enjoy our fellow NBA fans!
kyrie unstoppable
We can’t even finish a game without Vic smh
Why did it look like Tatum took 3 steps on the steal and dunk?? Is it just me?
What a comeback
Kyrie just played a great game and so did jason tatum and that's why they lost, cause of these 2 players.
With Oladipo the pacers kill the celtics.. Bojan a one man show out there.
And olidipo ain't playing hood
Good*
"GOOD"
Pacers getting swept I told ya
so we if we talking who the hell gon guard Kyrie on the bucks Not Bledsoe raptors not Lowry n the sixers ben Simmons a sell out like last year Kyrie hungry bro he proving it
there is a reason Celtics traded their whole team away for this guy
What about Tatum..? Give it up to him
It looked like in the 4th the Pacers were deliberately trying to throw the game. Where the hell is Myles Turner. Just been a train wreck lately. I hope this team can get their mojo back next year. Morale looks bleak as of late.
KHOOD!
First offense, then critical turnovers. We'll see what Indy does at home, I guess.
Kyrie is the definition of "good D, better take".
No better feeling than being there during that run
hortford block and tatum three pointer save the game at the end and i have to mentioned kirye Ervin was sensational
rozier rebound and basket at the end was a key play too
Bro these boys coming together as men. Tatum a beast
They sold at the end ??… Trash
Oladipo's shoes are to big for Collison to fill
5:41 The announcer LOL
Let's go Celtics get this SWEEP!!!
Where would the Celtics be without kyrie? Don’t get me wrong they have al Halford, jalen brown, and Hayward, but Celtics need kyrie if they want to win
I like the fast pace.
07-01-19.
??
nice tricks
0:58 ???
? ? ? ??